This September, we attended the NCAS Climate Modelling Summer School (CMSS), held at the University of Cambridge from 8th to 19th September. Five of us from the University of Reading joined this two-week residential programme. It was an intense and inspiring experience, full of lectures, coding sessions, discussions, and social events. In this blog, we would like to share our experiences.
Picture 1: Group Picture of Students and teaching staff. One cohort, many time zones, zero dull moments…
About NCAS CMSS
The NCAS Climate Modelling Summer School (CMSS) is a visionary program, launched in 2007 with funding originating from grant proposals led by Prof. Pier Luigi Vidale. Run by leading researchers from the National Centre for Atmospheric Science and the University of Reading, it’s an immersive, practice-driven program that equips early-career researchers and PhD students with deeper expertise in climate modelling, Earth system science, and state-of-the-art computing. Held biennially in Cambridge, CMSS has trained 350 students from roughly 40 countries worldwide.
The CMSS 2025 brought together around 30 participants, including PhD students and professionals interested in the field of Climate Modelling.
Long Days, Big Ideas: Inside Our Schedule
The school was full of activity from morning to evening. We started around 9:00 AM and usually wrapped up by 8:30 PM, with a good mix of lectures, practical sessions, and discussions that made the long days fly by.
Week 1 was led by Dr Hilary Weller, who ran an excellent series on Numerical Methods for Atmospheric Models. Mornings were devoted to lectures covering core schemes; afternoons shifted to hands-on Python sessions to implement and test the methods. Between blocks, invited talks from leading researchers across universities highlighted key themes in weather and climate modelling. After dinner, each day closed with a thought-provoking discussion on climate modelling, chaired by Prof. Pier Luigi Vidale, where participants shared ideas on improving models and their societal impact.
The week concluded with group presentations summarising the key takeaways from Hilary’s sessions and our first collaborative activity that set the tone for the rest of the school. It was followed by a relaxed barbecue evening, where everyone finally had a chance to unwind, chat freely, and celebrate surviving our first week together.
Picture 2 : Working on our group projects. Looks like NASA, feels like: ‘what’s our team name?’
Week 2 was all about getting hands-on with a climate model and learning how to analyse its output. We moved into group projects using SpeedyWeather.jl to design and run climate model experiments. It is a global atmospheric model with simplified physics, designed as a research playground. One of the developers of SpeedyWeather.jl, Milan Klöwer, was with us throughout the week to guide and support our work. Each team explored a different question, from sensitivity testing to analysing the model outputs, and spent the afternoons debugging, plotting, and comparing results. Evenings featured talks from leading scientists on topics such as the hydrological cycle, land and atmosphere interactions, and the carbon cycle.
The week also included a formal dinner at Sidney Sussex, a welcomed pause before our final presentations. On Friday 19th of September, every group presented its findings before we all headed home. Some slides were finished only seconds before presenting, but the atmosphere was upbeat and supportive. It was a satisfying end to two weeks of hard work, shared learning, and plentyof laughter. A huge thank you to the teaching team for being there, from the “silly” questions to the stubborn bugs. Your patience, clarity, and genuine care made all the difference.
Picture 3: SpeedyWeather, as told by its favourite storyteller Milan, Picture 4: Pier Luigi probably preparing for the next summer school..
Coffee, Culture, and Climate Chat
The best part of the summer school was the people. The group was diverse: PhD students, and professionals from different countries and research areas. We spent nearly every moment together, from breakfast to evening socials, often ending the day with random games of “Would You Rather” or talking about pets. The summer school’s packed schedule brought us closer and sparked rich chats about science and life, everything from AI’s role in climate modelling to the policy levers behind climate action. We left with a lot to think about. Meeting people from around the world exposed us to rich cultural diversity and new perspectives on how science is practiced in different countries, insights that were both fresh and valuable. It went beyond training: we left with skills, new friends, and the seeds of future collaborations, arguably the most important part of research.
Picture 5: Barbecue evening after wrapping up the first week, Picture 6: Formal dinner at Sidney Sussex, one last evening together before the final presentations
Reflections and takeaways
We didn’t become expert modellers in two weeks, but we did get a glimpse of how complex and creative climate modelling can be. The group presentations were chaotic but fun. Different projects, different approaches, and a few slides that weren’t quite finished in time. Some of us improvised more than we planned, but the atmosphere was supportive and full of laughter. More than anything, we learned by doing and by doing it together. The long days, the discussions, and the teamwork made it all worthwhile.
If you ever get the chance to go, take it. You’ll come back with new ideas, good memories, and friends who make science feel a little more human.
For the future participants
The NCAS CMSS usually opens in early spring, with applications closing around June. With limited spots, selection is competitive and merit-based, evaluating both fit for the course and the expected benefit to the student.
Bring curiosity, enthusiasm, and a healthy dose of patience, you’ll need all three. But honestly, that’s what makes it fun. You learn quickly, laugh a lot, and somehow find time to celebrate when a script finally runs without error. By the end, you’ll be tired, happy, and probably a little proud of how much you managed to do (and probably a few new friends who helped you debug along the way).
THERE HAD BEEN murmurings among the cricket lovers of the Meteorology department about resurrecting the Staff v Student cricket match each year when the darling buds of Spring give way to the lush green leaves of Summer and the drying out of the ground underfoot. It was time to get it going. It started with casual conversations over coffee about the logistics of resurrecting this beloved tradition, and then the feelers were sent out. Over 30 people signed up to be notified of developments, so I knew we would have enough players, and it was time to find a venue.
How foolish it was of me to assume that the University would have an on-campus cricket pitch – “a non-starter on campus” I was told by Sport@Reading: turns out they had turfed out their cricketers and exiled them to a far away land the other side of the M4. That would not do. Then came the excellent suggestion from one of the all-time cricketing greats of the department, Reg. Prof. Keith Shine who suggested we could ask over at Sol Joel Park about use of their facilities. A perfectly walkable distance away. But again I was met with an apologetic rebuttal – the facilities were fully booked out by regular-season teams. Looks like we were going to have to MacGyver this together ourselves. The plan was simple: plastic cones for a boundary and stumps on springs on a plain patch of grass near the SportsPark. But then came the revelation that PhD student Eme Dean-Lewis might be able to connect with the lovely folk over at Leighton Park School, just over the road at the Pepper Lane exit. It was all a little last minute, but it was done. The first Staff vs. Student match was to be held on the grounds of Leighton Park school on their beautifully kept ground in front of their adorable Victorian pavilion.
Students’ XI waiting their turn to bat in front the Leighton Park School pavilion. Image Credit: J. Williams
Gameday arrived. Tuesday 17th June 2025. Gloriously hot and dry: a perfect day for a game of cricket. We were to play a 22-over game so that everyone faced 12 balls but we had to be out of the ground by 20:45, so no hanging about! To speed things along, there were no re-bowls for wides or no balls, but a 2-run penalty. A 2 run penalty to the batting team for each wicket lost as well. The Students’ captain E. McKinnon-Gray and Staff captain K. M. R. Hunt went out to inspect the wicket and both had the same first impression. This looks like a subcontinental wicket – hard and dry with a few cracks. Not expecting a lot of bounce or seam movement but the spinners might have a field day…
At the toss, both captains were happy with Students’ XI batting first. The first over was N. Reddy to E. McKinnon-Gray and provided some of the highest quality cricket of the evening. Reddy was bowling fast and straight, but McKinnon-Gray was making use of that pace and managed to score 10 off the first over with a bye for the team taking the opening over score to 11-0. It was looking like a good day to bat. Following that was Shipley to Mammatt with a modest 3 including a wicket. Reddy to McKinnon-Gray was the story of the 3rd over, and two stories of the game as a whole. To make up for his expensive first over, Reddy elected to come over the wicket this time, and first ball pitched up viciously into McKinnon-Gray’s thumb resulting in a painful swelling. Great deal of help those expensive Gray-Nicolls gloves were! The following ball, wicket keeper S. Woolnough suffered the same fate to a searing yorker-length ball just outside off stump that went for a bye. Two fractured thumbs in two balls, Reddy took the pace off a bit and decided to bowl some medium-fast spin. The result was just 2 runs off the 3rd over. McKinnon-Gray and Woolnough continued to play through the pain.
McKinnon-Gray’s smashed thumb
Mammatt followed up with a well earned 3 runs off the bowling of W. Tsai. Up next was the batting pair of S. K. Panda and C. Miller. Like the other pairs, this represents one more and one less experienced player. All the inexperienced players made a great case for themselves and had a good time according to conversations I have had with them today. And that is the most important thing – that people enjoyed playing a team sport with their colleagues (and bosses!).
In the four overs that followed there were a flurry of runs and wickets. Panda crashed a delicious four on the offside which almost got lost in the bushes off Reddy’s fast spin. Miller, after scoring a run off the spin of C. O’Reilly, was caught and bowled by O’Reilly twice in consecutive balls. The eventual player of the match was giving us his first hint that he came here to win this match for team Staff. 5 runs off the Hunt to Panda over, followed by A. Charlton-Perez to Miller which resulted in another wicket, this time a catch by Woolnough off the tall spinner’s bowling.
In at 5 and 6 were the experienced D. Wood and the flying Dutchwoman with 0 games under her belt A. Te Winkel. Wood played a classy innings scoring 4 runs with a variety of classic strokes off the bowling of R. Kandala. Te Winkel scored a steady 3 off Williams’s and Shipley’s bowling. Up next were R. S. Nemani and G. Ching-Johnson. Nemani scored 3 and lost two wickets to the bowling of B. Senapati, while Ching-Johnson scored 1 and weathered the storm against a barrage of spin from Thompson and G. Hu. The best was yet to come for the student batters however – out walked L. Blunn and N. Inatimi with the Students foundering at 62-6 off 16. 4 overs later, they stood at 97-7 after Blunn crashed 21 off his two overs against the bowling of P. M. Inness and N. Reddy. Inatimi endured an eventful two overs, scoring 7 runs including a boundary – the only inexperienced player to do so – and was the 3rd victim of another O’Reilly caught and bowled. Up at 11 to give the Students a boost at the end was J. Charlton-Perez with a beautifully struck 12 from 12 balls (and making his dad run around a fair bit in the field!).
The final student net score of 107 must be caveated here by the fact that the Staff XI was in fact a Staff XIII – two extra players flew under the radar until near the end. With this taken into account, Staff only won by 9 runs, but in their batting innings they certainly made sure that there was no doubt over the winner.
Staff captain Hunt corralling his 13 fielders. Photo: J. Williams
The bowling started well for the Students, with EMG, JCP, Nemani, and Blunn conceding just 16 runs off the opening 4 overs of Hunt and Hu. It was during the staff batting that some creative nominations for player of the match began to be suggested. A very successful chase was about to start, possibly thanks to a seagull roaming around the perimeter. Another suggestion was in the form of umpire K. Shine who, if all the extras were credited to him was the top scorer by 400%! He did however play the full 44 overs – a valiant effort.
In at 3 and 4 were Thompson and Reddy whose mission was to “take off the scoreboard pressure”. And they did exactly that – 36 runs off their stand and Staff were already nearly halfway to Students’ total. No wickets fell in the next pairing of Senapati and Shipley – adding 25 more (mostly extras). The following pairing was what ultimately won the match for the Staff and cemented O’Reilly’s place as player of the match. O’Reilly hit a thunderous 24 off the bowling of Panda and McKinnon-Gray with Tsai contributing 4 more, and extras taking the staff score to within 2 of the Students’. The bowling of Blunn to Tsai also brought up arguably the highest quality piece of bowling and fielding of the match, a beautiful outswinger from Blunn nicked offside straight to the raised hands of Panda at first slip high above his head. A proper test dismissal. JCP’s wicket-keeping debut was off to a flyer with a stumping to end the final over of Tsai’s batting.
Kandala and Inness followed up, and although wickets fell to Panda and Blunn with a great performance from stand-in keeper JCP with a catch to add to his tally, the pair contributed 24 to the Staff score taking the game all but out of reach of the Students. Finally, it was the turn of Williams to bat and perhaps the most village moment of the whole game. While running for his first single off the bowling of Blunn, his box fell out onto the middle of the pitch! We then all politely looked away while he readjusted…! Blunn and J. Charlton-Perez got a wicket each with no extras, but despite their tight bowling, Williams’s 4 runs was enough to make sure of the result.
All in all, a great departmental social event, and hopefully a few more people can count themselves as enjoyers of cricket. See you all at the next one – students, we’ve got revenge to seek!
The making of 2024’s departmental pantomime Stratatouille actually began all the way back in the summer of that year. There had been conversations on some stifling hot days (not that there were many!) around the theme for the current year’s panto. A film viewing had taken place and characters had begun to be assigned. However, come October, no one could have predicted the twist this tale would have taken leading to the majority of PhD students reluctantly(?) donning chef hats and rat ears for the best part of the coming December.
STRATATOUILLE Poster
Our story actually begins even earlier, mere days after the roaring success of sshRACC in December 2023 – as is apparently tradition – the fabled Panto Cupboard Key was foisted upon me by one of last year’s organisers. I won’t name and shame – but my fate was sealed; I was to become the organiser for the 2024 departmental pantomime. But who, pray, would heed my call for a co-organiser in this, my hour of need? It all came down to a rather conniving bit of deception, whereby I managed to trick my co-coordinator into accepting the key when they may have been expecting a tasty treat. Who says the pantomime is begrudgingly organised? But our destiny was well and truly decided and laid out in front of us. In nine to ten short months, we would be organising a corral of unruly PhD students and support staff to put on the world’s greatest annual university meteorology department pantomime.
Coming back to where we began, at the start of the academic year, we had an extremely strong candidate for what we thought was going to be the theme of the panto, but as always, the story for the panto is decided in the second(?) PhD Group Meeting of the year in a democratic process. This is where our original plan got unseated. The strongest proprietor (with many supporters) of the originally planned theme made the fatal mistake of prioritising career development over their wishes for a panto theme and could not make the deciding session. As Rabbie Burns reminds us, “The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry” – this was one such instance. With only half the organising committee present to propose the original idea, a plucky upstart with one good joke took the stage and captured the imagination of the PhD cohort, and so it was decided: Stratatouille would be the theme for this year’s panto. As fatefully predicted in last year’s panto blog post…
Plot
After innumerable lunchtime and evening writing sessions, the bulk of the panto story was baked and ready to consume. It is here where we have to give another massive thank you to Caleb Miller, who spent hours and hours essentially transposing the original story of the film Ratatouille to be based in our department following the terribly cobbled together idea of a story that we had. All we had to do now was pepper it with jokes and puns pertaining to food and/or meteorology and we had a script that even Patton Oswalt would be proud to perform.
Audience review #1
“The best panto I’ve seen for many years”
– Dr. Pete Inness
The story begins with Remi the undergrat realising he feels unable to fulfil his ambition of doing serious research while surrounded by his decidedly unserious fellow undergrats. All they care about is getting drunk off snakebites, but Remi has a dream of becoming a great scientist and doing exceptional and interesting original research. While feeling dejected that he is too inferior to publish original research, he has an apparition of King Sir Professor Brian Hoskins* who gives him a message that anyone can be a scientist if they put their heart into it.
Then we meet Linguini, a floundering PhD student who feels like he isn’t cut out for the work he is undertaking and expected to do. In a moment of serendipity, Linguini leaves his laptop open and unlocked in the BH coffee area where Remi is able to take a look at the work he is carrying out analysing some CheeseCDF files. Remi realises Linguini’s coding is terrible, fixes a few bugs and manages to greatly improve the code Linguini was working on. This leads to Linguini accepting help from Remi to write a paper as part of his PhD.
In the next scene, Linguini is showing Remi around his PhD office, when the WCD (Weekly Cuisine Discussion) bell goes, and all the PhD students diligently trudge down to GU01 to attend. Admittedly the WCD scene doesn’t further the story much apart from giving Remi an insight into the breadth of research done in this meteorology kitchen. But we got a lot of laughs, good jokes and puns, and silly costumes into this scene so it was an audience and cast favourite. It is later in this scene that we meet the terrifying supervisor, brilliantly played by our regular cartoon villain Catherine Toolan. The supervisor is very tough on Linguini with high expectations and little patience. But that is all too easy for Remi who manages to complete the task the supervisor asked for in no time at all. They (Linguini napping with his feet up) spend the next few hours “cooking up some actual research”. When the supervisor returns, she is amazed to see that ‘Linguini’ has disproved the entire concept of PV. Suspicious that he has managed to attain such a level of skill so quickly, she recommends that he first present the work at a conference before they crack on with publishing the work.
At the conference, Linguini gives a great presentation (Remi is giving him slide-by-slide instructions) but makes a fatal error by taking nearly all of the credit and failing to mention he got any help from Remi. This alienates Remi who storms out of the conference to return to the department. Jumping forward in time, when Remi returns to and hatches a cunning plan to derail the entire department – stealing the tea and coffee money box (topical departmental news has appeared in the script!). Back at the conference, Remi is making a total fool of himself by not being able to answer even the simplest of questions from the audience, embarrassing his supervisor in the process. She interrogates him about this and finds out much to her dismay that an undergrat helped with the research. So disgusted is she at this that supervisor and the other staff members strike, leaving the department destitute of senior figures.
This leads to a moment where Remi and Linguini make up thanks to an apology, and Remi recruits a team of undergrats to help finish writing the paper they started. The paper is submitted to the journal Nature: Valley Bar where it is eventually inspected by the feared Reviewer 2, who is so impressed by the work that he recommends it be published with no changes (apart from citing one of his own papers). The story ends with KSPBH* re-appearing and handing Remi the keys to the department and naming the building after him.
Songs
Please Stop Me Now – there was a running theme of ‘difficult to sing but possibly worth the effort since they are well loved tunes’ for most songs this year, and this one was no exception. A parody of Queen’s 1979 mega-hit of Don’t Stop Me Now, our extremely talented band carried our pretty rubbish singing – but that didn’t stop it being some attendees’ favourite part of the show.
Audience review #2
“How did you guys come up with all those song lyrics and make them work? So funny and so impressive!”
– MSc Student
Come on Remi – One of the more singable tunes based on Come on Eileen by Dexys Midnight Runners, all about how much work Remi was going to have to do to get Linguini through his PhD work. In practising this one, we had choir master Catherine bellowing at us to sing louder, a task we all found much easier after a few glasses of boxed wine from the Winnersh Sainsbury’s. The Middle – Jimmy Eat World was the third song which I don’t think we even came up with a spoof title for; a punk-pop particularly catchy tune about the trials and tribulations of poor Linguini the PhD first year who is letting his stress get in the way of enjoying the start of his PhD. Money, Money, Money – an ABBA classic we also didn’t need to change the title of about the rats stealing the money box. We made the bold decision this year to plant much of the songs mid-scene. A directorial choice that I think helped the coherent telling of the story. Special mention here to Nathan’s amazing piano playing skills here – the rendition of Erik Satie’s Gymnopedie during the John Meth-Coq-au-Vin monologue was only improvised in the final dress rehearsal earlier that day! 500 Lines – a version of the Proclaimers’ singalong classic 500 Miles about how many lines Remi has to write to get their paper done! H-O-S-K-I-N-S : I’m not sure how Sir Brian feels about being the subject of the panto or at least a song every year, and this one was a little on the nose; but you really couldn’t ask for a better fit for one of the songs of the summer – Chappell Roan’s Hot to Go had exactly the right mood for what we wanted to sing, and I think it made for a great outro wonderfully delivered by one of the best KSPBH performances we’ve seen in a while by our very own Douglas Mulangwa.
Casting
It can be a bit like pulling teeth trying to cast the leading roles in the panto, and as one of the few first-year PhDs who have shown the extroversion to be able to tackle this and with great stage presence, the inimitable Jake Keller somewhat reluctantly agreed to be Remi with a fateful “if I have to” when asked repeatedly. I think he came around to really enjoying it, and the audience were also quite impressed –
Audience review #3
[To Jake]“You were great!”
– Regius Professor Keith Shine
And Andrea Rivosecchi as Linguini – at first he accepted but then realised he would have to learn even more lines than the main character; so we looked around and found a great doppelganger for the second act – not sure if any of you noticed – but in the second act Linguini was played by a different Italian man in Riccardo Monfardini! Some veterans of the game came through and gave us some great performances with Catherine as Supervisor and Hette Houtman as Pete Dinners. Shout out to Hette as one of last year’s organisers for also helping us with timing and who to contact for various admin duties. The remaining roles had under 5 lines, but all were delivered hilariously and brilliantly, and you all appear to have agreed.
Audience Review #5
“Catherine was quite scary as supervisor”
– Dr Andy Apple Turnover Turner (Catherine’s PhD Supervisor)
The Night (and Day) of the Panto
So as many of you agreed, the Act 1 cameo from our antipodean friend Robbie Marks (the star of last year’s panto) was one of the best moment’s of the panto:
Audience review #4
“I can’t believe Robby came through and made that for us!”
– Gabrielle Ching-Johnson (Undergrat #2)
This is where I would like to make the point that he sent me those videos the morning of the show, and we had to hurriedly stitch together his several renditions of that speech in different locations with the cinematic walk off. Special thanks to Rosie (last year’s co-organiser) for helping with the video editing, and generally for being a great help to us organisers this year by giving advice and keeping us on time (mostly). Robby was sent a video of the mirthful reaction to his cameo with the reaction “F*** yeah, glad I could make an appearance”. The day went much more smoothly than last year, with us occupying the Madejski lecture theatre from 2pm onwards with no interruptions, we had plenty of time to set up the tech and instruments, as well as squeeze in a final full rehearsal. Set up the ticket booth, and we were ready to go! 150 people filed in for a great attendance to our show. Not to forget a great buffet beforehand to get everyone in the mood for the flagship event in the departmental calendar.
Act 1 and Act 2 managed to run for about the same amount of time, 30 mins a piece for an hour-long panto, as we had planned – brilliant! The interval acts, however put paid to that. A mammoth 45-minute session full of controversy and some of the biggest laughs of the night. We saw Stroopwaffels crowned the winner of the big biscuit bracket, however this was vetoed by the head of department who quite rightly pointed out they are not a biscuit and so the runner up chocolate hobnobs was our true champion. Professor Coq-au-Vin was not the only one to take issue with this controversial result. The 3L68 team of Dan Shipley, Jake Bland and Brian Lo made the argument that Bourbons had been wrongfully expelled and would have won this year, and so Dan delivered a hilarious diatribe explaining how they came to decide which Bourbon was best, and therefore the true winner of the biscuit bracket. I don’t remember which one it was in the end (M&S?) – check the video recordings of the night to find out for yourselves.
A pleasant break from the commotion of the biscuit brackets was brought around from some classical piano performed by Amber Te Winkel, and then some might say the only reason they attend the panto – Mr Mets. A blinder of an episode where Peter Clark was apologised to (again – and rejected on his behalf by Humphrey), and insinuated to have signed up to OnlyFans with the most innocent of intentions. The theme of the story was John Methven’s takeover as head of department, with him bumbling along and struggling to fulfil the role while eating copious amounts of ‘free’ food (it’s not free if you use department funds to pay for it, Prof. Methven!). Just to clarify that no one thinks John will struggle to fulfil the role, but as HOD I’m afraid you have to expect a fair bit of derision at these sorts of performances!
Following that, another side-splittingly funny act followed with an after party led by DJ Shonk that included a rare slow number – all in aid of blossoming romance on the dancefloor.
The amazing cast and crew who made STRATATOUILLE happen!
Reflections
As always, the Panto is months of hard work to organise, and things only ever seem to come together in the eleventh hour. But we had a great team and cast and band that really made it come together beautifully. Acting on stage, playing in a live band, organising a production, generally being a thesp isn’t the kind of thing you expect to hear from a large majority of the PhD students of the world’s leading Meteorology department. But it is these experiences, very far outside most of our comfort zones that builds strong and adaptable characters. And I think this experience has probably given us, as organisers and performers alike, more useful skills than we might have realised. This will, however, probably be these director-producers’ debut and final production.
A huge thank you to everyone who attended and contributed to the panto in any way, no matter how small. Your participation is what makes this a great bonding experience for the department, and you are all greatly appreciated!
I’ve been keen to ‘do my bit’ for climate science communication for a while now. While I do like attending a good public lecture or seminar, I wanted to try something a bit different, particularly something I could bring my love of comedy into. So, when a science stand-up comedy event was pointed out to me (thanks to Tara Bryer of Climate Outreach!) I thought I’d give it a go.
The event in question is ‘Science Showoff’, an event designed to communicate science via comedy. It’s held on the last Wednesday every month in London, currently held at The Harrison near Kings Cross station, and has been running for over 10 years. And it’s open to absolutely anyone to perform – no comedic credentials required. The only rules are it’s 9-minute sets, must be about something STEM related, and should (hopefully) be funny!
I performed in the August event and decided to base my set broadly on my research field of modelling the effects of aerosols on climate. Basing the set on my research made it slightly easier as I knew the science content already and just needed to write the comedy – though one can definitely go for more adventurous topics. While to a non-scientist that might sound a bit dry, it’s actually not too difficult to come up with jokes about climate science – as anyone who’s helped write a Met Panto script will surely know.
For example, framing it as an explanation of my hatred of something as innocuous as deodorant (which as it turns out, makes a decent low-effort physical demonstration of aerosols) seemed a good way to make content easier to understand and line up some more relatable jokes. Having a physical prop, even as simple as a deodorant can, also turned out to be an easy way to ‘wow’ the audience (they set a very low bar indeed for being impressed by my ‘live science’). There’s also a wealth of jokes from being a climate ‘modeller’ – you’ve just got to work it 😉
On the day, while I was very nervous before the event and into the first minute or two of my set, after that it was great fun. The audience, of about 30 people, were incredibly friendly and the host, Steve, was very supportive. After all, while you’re there for comedy, there’s not much pressure as many of the acts (myself included) have never performed stand-up comedy before. The set mostly went to plan, though I did add a little improvisation in response to audience reactions when they liked a joke more than I’d expected, and when audience members were reluctant to participate – who’d have thought leading one of them into a joke at their expense would make the others so reluctant? It was also a lot of fun going from being an audience member worried about being picked on, to the one who gets to pick on people – the audience engagement was definitely the most enjoyable part.
It was also huge fun just writing the set. I didn’t set myself loads of pressure, just occasionally thinking of jokes while walking or on the train and making a note of it, and then put it all together the weekend before and rehearsed the evening before. Again, if you’re ever helped write the Panto script or Sappo email, you’ll know how much fun this all can be (although I’m now regretting not getting pizza in while I wrote it).
And as a bonus, I got to listen to the other five acts perform, sometimes riffing off my jokes too! We had everything from penguins in the Antarctic to the most embarrassing lab accidents you could imagine. The acts were by people from a range of scientific disciplines and backgrounds including PhD students, a lecturer, and a professional science communicator.
I can’t say much more to describe the experience itself, but if you want an idea of what it’s like, you can check out some recorded previous sets (while there is some rather questionable footage of my own act, there is not a chance I’m sharing it here – I’m not that confident :P). Or of course, go attend the next Science Showoff or a similar science comedy event.
What I would say though is if you also want to do climate science communication (or try a different format for it) and are a fan of comedy – (looking at any and all Met Panto-ers especially here) – then you should consider giving this a go! Yes, even if you’ve never done stand-up comedy before… I mean it can’t be more embarrassing than acting out a lecturer in Panto while they watch!
Any questions about the experience or want to be persuaded to give it a try??? Feel free to comment or email me 🙂
On Friday the 14th of June at 6.30pm the Department of Meteorology had its 2019 summer BBQ! And what a fun, pleasant and well attended affair it was.
BBQ turnout – downtime for the department!
The weather that week had been especially awful, and the prospects of being able to have the BBQ outside were looking distinctly grim, but in a rather fluky stroke of luck, the weather took a rather unexpected turn for the better… and almost unbelievably, by Friday PM the grass was deemed dry enough – and therefore safe enough – for the event to be an outdoor, in-the-sun affair!
The event required a lot of preparation. For the most part this went smoothly, save for one or two things:
1: A sudden and panicky realisation on my part on the morning of the BBQ (thanks Michael L!) that we probably weren’t going to get very far without tongs/cooking implements of some kind! (This is my first Met BBQ, okay!)
2: The butcher delivery van going seriously AWOL (even from the butchers themselves). The van apparently departed the Reading depot at 9am and must have then gotten lost as it took them some 8 hours to find us! This caused some nerves to fray…
The event took off at 6.30pm and thanks to a small army of well-trained BBQing PhD students, both meat and plant-based sausages and burgers soon began to appear and (as we had slightly over ordered on the food front) attendees got offered seconds! No one present was to go hungry!
The BBQing army.
At around 8pm the perennial Hogs Back Band & caller began their ceilidh/barn dance. Many of us were duly terrified of this part of the evening, but such concerns quickly vanished following a few nervous giggles, a couple of bungled dance steps… and of course one or two beers. Before long, everyone, both dancers and onlookers, children and staff alike were totally caught up in the band’s buoyant jig, and all feeling of self-consciousness evaporated!
2 hours of ceilidh as it turns out, is incredibly tiring! I managed about half of the 10 dances and towards the end was beginning to seriously unravel at the seams. Perhaps a prize in future years for he or she who can manage to stick out every single dance? Surely one of the Met runners has the stamina?
As the evening drew to a close at 10pm I was impressed by the sustained, voluntary and joint effort of many to return the area to its original clean state. And, for those with energy to spare, the after-party with DJ Shonk and his new disco ball awaited!
A special thanks to Dan Shipley (one of the 2018 organisers) who despite supposedly having retired the year before, provided much help and advice at all stages of the planning and on the day! Numerous others also contributed in ways both big and small to make the event the success that it was. Thank you! Long live this particular Met Department tradition!
The Social Metwork 